If you like us, please share us on social media.
The latest UCD Hyperlibrary newsletter is now complete, check it out.

MindTouch
http://mindtouch.com

This file and accompanying files are licensed under the MindTouch Master Subscription Agreement (MSA).

At any time, you shall not, directly or indirectly: (i) sublicense, resell, rent, lease, distribute, market, commercialize or otherwise transfer rights or usage to: (a) the Software, (b) any modified version or derivative work of the Software created by you or for you, or (c) MindTouch Open Source (which includes all non-supported versions of MindTouch-developed software), for any purpose including timesharing or service bureau purposes; (ii) remove or alter any copyright, trademark or proprietary notice in the Software; (iii) transfer, use or export the Software in violation of any applicable laws or regulations of any government or governmental agency; (iv) use or run on any of your hardware, or have deployed for use, any production version of MindTouch Open Source; (v) use any of the Support Services, Error corrections, Updates or Upgrades, for the MindTouch Open Source software or for any Server for which Support Services are not then purchased as provided hereunder; or (vi) reverse engineer, decompile or modify any encrypted or encoded portion of the Software.

A complete copy of the MSA is available at http://www.mindtouch.com/msa

# Nernst Equation

The Nernst Equation enables the determination of cell potential under non-standard conditions. It relates the measured cell potential to the reaction quotient and allows the accurate determination of equilibrium constants (including solubility constants).

### Introduction

The Nernst Equation is derived from the Gibbs free energy under standard conditions.

$E^o = E^o_{reduction} - E^o_{oxidation} \tag{1}$

$$\Delta{G}$$ is also related to $$E$$ under general conditions (standard or not) via

$\Delta{G} = -nFE \tag{2}$

with

• $$n$$ is the number of electrons transferred in the reaction (from balanced reaction),
• $$F$$ is the Faraday constant (96,500 C/mol), and
• $$E$$ is potential difference.

Under standard conditions, equation 2 is then

$\Delta{G}^{o} = -nFE^{o}. \tag{3}$

Hence, when $$E^o$$ is positive, the reaction is spontaneous and when $$E^o$$ is negative, the reaction is non-spontaneous. From thermodynamics, the Gibbs energy change under non-standard conditions can be related to the Gibbs energy change under standard equations via

$\Delta{G} = \Delta{G}^o + RT \ln Q \tag{4}$

Substituting $$\Delta{G} = -nFE$$ and $$\Delta{G}^{o} = -nFE^{o}$$ into equation 4, we have:

$-nFE = -nFE^o + RT \ln Q \tag{5}$

Divide both sides of the equation above by $$-nF$$, we have

$E = E^o - \dfrac{RT}{nF} \ln Q \tag{6}$

Equation 6 can be rewritten in the form of $$\log_{10}$$:

$E = E^o - \dfrac{2.303 RT}{nF} \log Q \tag{Generalized Nernst Equation}$

At standard temperature T = 298 K, the $$\frac{2.303 RT}{F}$$ term equals 0.0592 V and this equation turns into:

$E = E^o - \dfrac{0.0592\, V}{n} \log Q \tag{Nernst Equation @ 298 K}$

The equation above indicates that the electrical potential of a cell depends upon the reaction quotient $$Q$$ of the reaction. As the redox reaction proceeds, reactants are consumed, and thus concentration of reactants decreases. Conversely, the products concentration increases due to the increased in products formation. As this happens, cell potential gradually decreases until the reaction is at equilibrium, at which $$\Delta{G} = 0$$. At equilibrium, the reaction quotient $$Q = K_{eq}$$. Also, at equilibrium, $$\Delta{G} = 0$$ and $$\Delta{G} = -nFE$$, so $$E = 0$$.

Therefore, substituting $$Q = K_{eq}$$ and $$E = 0$$ into the Nernst equation, we have:

$0 = E^o - \dfrac{RT}{nF} \ln K_{eq} \tag{7}$

At standard conditions, the equation above simplifies into:

$0 = E^o - \dfrac{0.0592\, V}{n} \log K_{eq} \tag{8}$

This equation can be rearranged into:

$\log K_{eq} = \dfrac{nE^o}{0.0592\, V} \tag{9}$

The equation above indicates that the equilibrium constant $$K_{eq}$$ is proportional to the standard potential of the reaction. Specifically, when:

• $$K > 1, E^o > 0$$, reaction favors products formation.
• $$K < 1, E^o < 0$$, reaction favors reactants formation.

This result fits Le Châtlier's Principle, which states that when a system at equilibrium experiences a change, the system will minimize that change by shifting the equilibrium in the opposite direction.

Example 1

The $$E^{o}_{cell} = +1.10 \; V$$ for the Zn-Cu redox reaction:

$Zn_{(s)} + Cu^{2+}_{(aq)} \rightleftharpoons Zn^{2+}_{(aq)} + Cu_{(s)}.$

What is the equilibrium constant for this reversible reaction?

SOLUTION

Under standard conditions, $$[Cu^{2+}] = [Zn^{2+}] = 1.0\, M$$ and T = 298 K. As the reaction proceeds, $$[Cu^{2+}]$$ decreases as $$[Zn^{2+}]$$ increases. Lets say after one minute, $$[Cu^{2+}] = 0.05\, M$$ while $$[Zn^{2+}] = 1.95\, M$$. According to the Nernst equation, the cell potential after 1 minute is:

$E = E^o - \dfrac{0.0592 V}{n} \log Q$

$E = 1.10V - \dfrac{0.0592 V}{2} \log\dfrac{1.95 \; M}{0.05 \; M}$

$E = 1.05 \; V$

As you can see, the initial cell potential is $$E = 1.10\, V$$, after 1 minute, the potential drops to 1.05 V. This is after 95% of the reactants have been consumed. As the reaction continues to progress, more $$Cu^{2+}$$ will be consumed and more $$Zn^{2+}$$ will be generated (at a 1:1 ratio). As a result, the cell potential continues to decrease and when the cell potential drops down to 0, the concentration of reactants and products stops changing.

This is when the reaction is at equilibrium. From from equation 9, the $$K_{eq}$$ can be calculated from

$\log K_{eq} = \dfrac{2 \times 1.10\, V}{0.0592\,V}$

$\log K_{eq} = 37.2$

$K_{eq} = 10^{37.2}= 1.58 \times 10^{37}$

This make sense from a Le Châtlier's Principle, since the reaction strongly favors the products over the reactants to result in a large $$E^{o}_{cell}$$ of 1.103 V. Hence, the cell is greatly out of equilibrium under standard conditions. Reactions that are just weakly out of equilibrium will have smaller $$E^{o}_{cell}$$ values (neglecting a change in $$n$$ of course).

### References

1. Atkins, Peter and de Paula, Julio. Physical Chemistry for the Life Sciences. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. p. 214-222.
2. Sherwood, Lauralee. Human Physiology 6th edition. Thompson Corp. 2007. p. 77
00:25, 18 Jun 2014

## Classifications

(not set)
(not set)

### Textbook Maps

An NSF funded Project