Interesting online CONFCHEM discussion going on right now on the ChemWiki and

greater STEMWiki Hyperlibary project. Come join the discussion.

ChemWiki: The Dynamic Chemistry Hypertext > Physical Chemistry > Quantum Mechanics > 9: The Hydrogen Atom > Atomic Theory > Electrons in Atoms > Electron Spin

Electron Spin

Electron Spin or Spin Quantum Number is the fourth quantum number for electrons in atoms and molecules. Denoted as \(m_s\), the electron spin is constituted by either upward (\(m_s=+1/2\)) or downward (\(m_s=-1/2\)) arrows.

In 1920, Otto Stern and Walter Gerlach designed an experiment, which unintentionally led to the discovery that electrons have their own individual, continuous spin even as they move along their orbital of an atom. Today, this electron spin is indicated by the fourth quantum number, also known as the **Electron Spin Quantum Number** and denoted by *m*_{s}. In 1925, Samuel Goudsmit and George Uhlenbeck made the claim that features of the hydrogen spectrum that were unexamined might by explained by assuming electrons act as if it has a spin. This spin can be denoted by an arrow pointing up, which is +1/2, or an arrow pointing down, which is -1/2.

The experiment mentioned above by Otto Stern and Walter Gerlach was done with silver which was put in an oven and vaporized. The result was that silver atoms formed a beam that passed through a magnetic field in which it split in two.

An explanation of this is that an electron has a magnetic field due to its spin. When electrons that have opposite spins are put together, there is no net magnetic field because the positive and negative spins cancel each other out. The silver atom used in the experiment has a total of 47 electrons, 23 of one spin type, and 24 of the opposite. Because electrons of the same spin cancel each other out, the one unpaired electron in the atom will determine the spin. There is a high likelihood for either spin due to the large number of electrons, so when it went through the magnetic field it split into two beams.

**Note: In this module, capital "L" will be used instead of small case "l" for angular momentum quantum number.**

A total of four quantum numbers were developed to better understand the movement and pathway of electrons in its designated orbital within an atom.

- Principal quantum number (
*n*): energy level*n*= 1, 2, 3, 4, ... - Orbital Angular Momentum Quantum Number (
*L*): shape (of orbital)*L*= 0, 1, 2, 3, ...*n*-1 - Magnetic Quantum Number (
*m*_{L}): orientation= interval of (-*m*_{L}*L*, +*L*) **Electron Spin Quantum Number**(*m*_{s}):__independent__of other three quantum numbers because*m*_{s}*is always = –½ or +½*

**(For more information about the three quantum numbers above, see ****Quantum Number****.)**

The lines represent how many orientations each orbital has, (e.g. the s-orbital has one orientation, a p-orbital has three orientations, etc.) and each line can hold up to two electrons, represented by up and down arrows. An electron with an up arrow means it has an electron spin of +\(\frac{1}{2}\), and an electron with a down arrow means it has an electron spin of -\(\frac{1}{2}\).

Significance: determines if an atom will or will not generate a magnetic field (For more information, scroll down to *Magnetic Spin, Magnetism, and Magnetic Field Lines*). Although the electron spin is limited to *+½ * or *–½*, certain rules apply when assigning electrons of different spins to fill a subshell (orientations of an orbital) . For more information, scroll down to *Assigning Spin Direction*.

An atom with **unpaired** electrons are termed as **paramagnetic**

- results in a
**net**magnetic field because electrons within the orbital are not stabilized or balanced enough - atoms are attracted to magnets

An atom with **paired** electrons are termed as **diamagnetic**

- results in
**no**magnetic field because electrons are uniform and stabilized within the orbital - atoms are not attracted to magnets

Applying concepts of magnetism with liquid nitrogen and liquid oxygen:

{{media("http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KcGEev8qulA\)

The magnetic spin of an electron follows in the direction of the magnetic field lines as shown below.

An effective visual on how to assign spin directions can be represented by the orbital diagram (shown previously and below.) Restrictions apply when assigning spin directions to electrons, so the following Pauli Exclusion Principle and Hund's Rule help explain this.

When one is filling an orbital, such as the p orbital, you must fill all orbitals possible with one electron spin before assigning the opposite spin. For example, when filling the fluorine, which will have a total of two electrons in the s orbital and a total of five electrons in the p orbital, one will start with the s orbital which will contain two electrons. So, the first electron one assigns will be spin up and the next spin down. Moving on to the three p orbitals that one will start by assigning a spin up electron in each of the three orbitals. That takes up three of the five electrons, so with the remaining two electrons, one returns to the first and second p orbital and assigns the spin down electron. This means there will be one unpaired electron in fluorine so it will be paramagnetic.

The Pauli exclusion principle declares that there can only be a maximum of two electrons for every one orientation, and the two electrons must be opposite in spin direction; meaning one electron has \(m_s = +\frac{1}{2}\) and the other electron has \(m_s = -\frac{1}{2}\).

Hund's Rule declares that the electrons in the orbital are filled up first by the +\(\frac{1}{2}\) spin. Once all the orbitals are filled with unpaired +\(\frac{1}{2}\) spins, the orbitals are then filled with the -\(\frac{1}{2}\) spin. (**See examples below, labeled electronic configuration.)**

**(For more information on Pauli Exclusion Principle and Hund's Rules, see Electronic Configuration.)**

- Determine the number of electrons the atom has.
- Draw the electron configuration for the atom. See Electronic Configurations for more information.
- Distribute the electrons, using up and down arrows to represent the electron spin direction.

Example 1: Sulfur

Sulfur - S (16 electrons)

Electronic Configuration:

1s^{2} 2s^{2} 2p^{6} 3s^{2} 3p^{4} **OR** [Ne] 3s^{2} 3p^{4}

As shown in the following image, this is a demonstration of a -\(\frac{1}{2}\) and a +\(\frac{1}{2}\) Electron Spin.

When given a principle quantum number, n, with either the s, p, d or f-orbital, identify all the possibilities of L, m_{L} and m_{s}.

Example 2

Given 5f, identify all the possibilities of the four quantum numbers.

**SOLUTION**

In this problem, the principle quantum number is n = 5 (the subshell number placed in front of the orbital, the f-orbital in this case). Since** **we are looking at the f-obital, therefore L = 3. (Look under "Subshells" in the module Quantum Numbers for more information) Knowing L = 3, we can interpret that m_{L} = 0, \(\pm\) 1, \(\pm\) 2, \(\pm\) 3 since m_{L} = -L,...,-1, 0, 1,...+L. As for m_{s}, since it isn't specified in the problem as to whether it is -\(\frac{1}{2}\) or +\(\frac{1}{2}\), therefore for this problem, it could be both; meaning that the electron spin quantum number is \(\pm\)\(\frac{1}{2}\).

Example 3

Given 6s and m_{L}= +1, identify all the possibilities of the four quantum numbers.

**SOLUTION**

The principle quantum number is n = 6. Looking at the s-orbital, we know that L = 0. Knowing that m_{L} = -L,...,-1, 0, 1,...+L, therefore m_{L} = +1 is **not possible** since in this problem, the interval of m_{L} can only equal to 0 according to the angular momentum quantum number, L.

Example 4

Given 4d and m_{s} = +\(\frac{1}{2}\), identify all the possibilities of the four quantum numbers.

**SOLUTION**

The principle quantum number is n = 4. Given that it is a d-orbital, we know that L = 2. Therefore, m_{L} = 0, \(\pm\) 1, \(\pm\) 2 since m_{L} = -L,...,-1, 0, 1,...+L. For m_{s}, this problem specifically said m_{s }= +\(\frac{1}{2}\); meaning that the electron spin quantum number is +\(\frac{1}{2}\).

First, draw a table labeled n, L, m_{L}and m_{s}, as shown below:

n | L | m_{L} | m_{s} |

Then, depending on what the question is asking for, fill in the boxes accordingly. Finally, determine the number of electrons for the given quantum number, n, with regards to L, m_{L} and m_{s}.

Example 5

How many electrons can have n = 5 and L = 1? __ 6 __

n | L | m_{L} | m_{s} |

5 | 1 | -1 | -\(\frac{1}{2}\) , +\(\frac{1}{2}\) |

0 | |||

+1 |

This problem includes both -\(\frac{1}{2}\) , +\(\frac{1}{2}\) , therefore the answer is __ 6__ electrons based on the m

Example 6

How many electrons can have n = 5 and m_{s }= -\(\frac{1}{2}\)? __ 5 __

n | L | m_{L} | m_{s} |

5 | 4 | \(\pm\) 4 | -\(\frac{1}{2}\) |

3 | \(\pm\) 3 | ||

2 | \(\pm\) 2 | ||

1 | \(\pm\) 1 | ||

0 | 0 |

This problem only wants the Spin Quantum Number to be -\(\frac{1}{2}\) , the answer is __ 5__ electrons based on the m

Example 7

How many electrons can have n = 3, L = 2 and m_{L} = 3? __ zero __

**SOLUTION**

n | L | m_{L} | m_{s} |

3 | 2 | NOT POSSIBLE |

Example 8

How many electrons can have n = 3, m_{L} = +2 and m_{s }= +\(\frac{1}{2}\)? __ 1 __

**SOLUTION**

n | L | m_{L} | m_{s} |

3 | 2 | -2, +2 | +\(\frac{1}{2}\) |

1 | \(\pm\) 1 | ||

0 | 0 |

This problem only wants the Spin Quantum Number to be +\(\frac{1}{2}\) , the answer is __ 1__ electrons based on the m

- Petrucci, Ralph. Harwood, William. Herring, Geoffrey. Madura, Jeffery.
*General Chemistry: Principles and Modern Applications, 9th Edition.*Pearson Education, Inc. New Jersey, 2007. - Li, Gengyun.
*What is the Electron Spin?*Spin Publishing, 2003. - Motz, Lloyd and Weaver, Jefferson H.
*The Unfolding Universe: A Stellar Journey.*Perseus, 1989. - http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Physical_Chemistry/Quantum_Mechanics/Atomic_Theory/Electrons_in_Atoms/Electron_Spin
- Petrucci, Ralph, F. Herring, Jeffrey Madura, Carey Bissonnette.
*General Chemistry: Principles and Modern Applications, Custom Edition.*Pearson Education, Inc. New jersey, 2011.

- Identify the spin direction (e.g. m
_{s}= -\(\frac{1}{2}\) or +\(\frac{1}{2}\) or \(\pm\)\(\frac{1}{2}\) ) of the outermost electron in a Sodium (Na) atom. - Identify the spin direction of the outermost electron in a Chlorine (Cl) atom.
- Identify the spin direction of the outermost electron in a Calcium (Ca) atom.
- Given 5p and m
_{s}= +\(\frac{1}{2}\), identify all the possibilities of the four quantum numbers. - Given 6f, identify all the possibilities of the four quantum numbers.
- How many electrons can have n = 4 and L = 1?
- How many electrons can have n = 4, L = 1, m
_{L}= -2 and m_{s}= +\(\frac{1}{2}\)? - How many electrons can have n = 5, L = 3, m
_{L}= \(\pm\) 2 and m_{s}= +\(\frac{1}{2}\)? - How many electrons can have n = 5, L = 4, m
_{L}= +3 and m_{s}= -\(\frac{1}{2}\)? - How many electrons can have n = 4, L = 2, m
_{L}= \(\pm\)1 and m_{s}= -\(\frac{1}{2}\)? - How many electrons can have n = 3, L = 3, m
_{L}= +2?

__ Problem (1):__ Sodium (Na) --> Electronic Configuration [Ne] 3s

Spin direction for the valence electron or m_{s} = +\(\frac{1}{2}\)

Sodium (Na) with a neutral charge of zero is paramagnetic, meaning that the electronic configuration for Na consists of one or more unpaired electrons.

__ Problem (2):__ Chlorine (Cl) --> Electronic Configuration [Ne] 3s

Spin direction for the valence electron or m_{s} = +\(\frac{1}{2}\)

Chlorine (Cl) with a neutral charge of zero is paramagnetic.

__ Problem (3):__ Calcium (Ca) --> Electronic Configuration [He] 4s

Spin direction for the valence electron or m_{s} = \(\pm\)\(\frac{1}{2}\)

Whereas for Calcium (Ca) with a neutral charge of zero, it is diamagnetic; meaning that ALL the electrons are paired as shown in the image above.

** Problem (4):** Given 5p and m

The principle quantum number is n = 5. Given that it is a p-orbital, we know that L = 2. And based on L, m_{L} = 0, \(\pm\) 1, \(\pm\) 2 since m_{L} = -L,...,-1, 0, 1,...+L. As for m_{s}, this problem specifically says m_{s} = -\(\frac{1}{2}\), meaning that the spin direction is -\(\frac{1}{2}\), pointing downwards ("down" spin).

** Problem (5):** Given 6f, identify all the possibilities of the four quantum numbers.

The principle quantum number is n = 6. Given that it is a f-orbital, we know that L = 3. Based on L, m_{L} = 0, \(\pm\) 1, \(\pm\) 2, \(\pm\) 3 since m_{L} = -L,...,-1, 0, 1,...+L. As for m_{s}, since it isn't specified in the problem as to whether it is -\(\frac{1}{2}\) or +\(\frac{1}{2}\), therefore for this problem, it could be both; meaning that the electron spin quantum number is \(\pm\)\(\frac{1}{2}\).

__ Problem (6):__ How many electrons can have n = 4 and L = 1?

n | L | m_{L} | m_{s} |

4 | 1 | \(\pm\) 1 | -\(\frac{1}{2}\) , +\(\frac{1}{2}\) |

0 |

This problem includes both -\(\frac{1}{2}\) , +\(\frac{1}{2}\) , therefore the answer is __ 6__ electrons based on the m

__ Problem (7):__ How many electrons can have n = 4, L = 1, m

n | L | m_{L} | m_{s} |

4 | 1 | NOT POSSIBLE | +\(\frac{1}{2}\) |

Since **m _{L} = -L...-1, 0, +1...+L**, m

__ Problem (8):__ How many electrons can have n = 5, L = 3, m

n | L | m_{L} | m_{s} |

5 | 3 | \(\pm\) 2 | +\(\frac{1}{2}\) |

\(\pm\) 1 | |||

0 |

This problem only wants the Spin Quantum Number to be +\(\frac{1}{2}\) and m_{L} = \(\pm\) 2, therefore __ 2__ electrons can have n = 5, L = 3, m

__ Problem (9):__ How many electrons can have n = 5, L = 4 and m

n | L | m_{L} | m_{s} |

5 | 4 | -3, +3 | -\(\frac{1}{2}\) , +\(\frac{1}{2}\) |

\(\pm\) 2 | |||

\(\pm\) 1 | |||

0 |

This problem includes both -\(\frac{1}{2}\) and +\(\frac{1}{2}\) and given that m_{L} = +3, therefore the answer is ** 2** electrons.

__ Problem (10):__ How many electrons can have n = 4, L = 2 and m

n | L | m_{L} | m_{s} |

4 | 2 | \(\pm\) 1 | -\(\frac{1}{2}\) , +\(\frac{1}{2}\) |

0 |

This problem includes both -\(\frac{1}{2}\) and +\(\frac{1}{2}\) and given that m_{L} = \(\pm\) 1, therefore the answer is ** 4** electrons.

__ Problem (11):__ How many electrons can have n = 3, L = 3, m

n | L | m_{L} | m_{s} |

3 | 3 (NOT POSSIBLE) | \(\pm\) 2 | -\(\frac{1}{2}\) |

\(\pm\) 1 | |||

0 |

Since **L = n - 1,** there is ** zero** electron, not possible because in this problem, n = L = 3.

- Liza Chu (UCD), Sharon Wei (UCD), Mandy Lam (UCD), Lara Cemo (UCD)

Last modified

04:50, 18 Jul 2015

**Analytical Chemistry**

**Biological Chemistry**

**Inorganic Chemistry**

**Organic Chemistry**

**Physical Chemistry**

**Theoretical Chemistry**

**Diablo Valley College**

**Hope College**

**Howard University**

**Purdue University**

**Sacramento City College**

**United Arab Emirates U**

**UC Davis**

**UC Irvine**

**General Chemistry**

**Analytical Chemistry**

**Organic Chemistry**

**Physical Chemistry**

**Theoretical Chemistry**

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number 1246120

- © Copyright 2015 Chemwiki

Unless otherwise noted, content in the UC Davis ChemWiki is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at copyright@ucdavis.edu. Questions and concerns can be directed toward Prof. Delmar Larsen (dlarsen@ucdavis.edu), Founder and Director. Terms of Use