If you like the ChemWiki, please "like" us on facebook, "share" us on Google+, or "tweet" about the project.
If we examine a particle traveling freely described by a quantummechanical plane wave, Y = Aeikx if the particle is traveling in the +x direction. We have seen that the momentum of this particle can be calculated exactly using the momentum operator
If we now ask where this particle is we examine the probability density of the particle Y*Y = Aeikx Aeikx = A2. Since the square of A has no xdependence we have no information regarding the position of the particle. In other words, if we know the momentum of the particle exactly, the position is completely unknown.
Suppose we assume that the particle can be located in space and has a Gaussian probability distribution. Then instead of a constant prefactor A we would have a Gaussian prefactor and the wavefunction becomes
Note that the Gaussian function expressed in terms of (x � x0) signifies a Gaussian centered at x0. This distribution in space implies a distribution of momenta since
Which is a Fourier transform of the two conjugate variables position and momentum. Note how the relationship between these two conjugate variables implies a quantitative relationship between their distributions. To calculate Y(p) we need to complete the square. In order to demonstrate this we will calculate a simpler distribution. Imagine that our particle is found centered at the origin so x0 = 0. We can then solve the integral
By multiplying by a term equal to exp{k2} inside and exp{k2} outside the integral.
Thus, we have
Note that in fact this gives a moment distribution since k = p/á. Note also that substituting x � x0 for x will not change this result. This result shows that the Fourier transform of a Gaussian is also a Gaussian (in the space of the conjugate variable). This result is quite useful for quantifying the relationships between conjugate variables.
How does this result give us an uncertainty principle? We now include a Gaussian standard deviation that we will call Dx and one for momentum that we will call Dk.
The Fourier transform then has the form
which implies that Dx Dk = 1 in order for eikx to conform to the definition of a Fourier transform.
This in turn implies that Dx Dp = á. The relationship described here implies that the linear momentum and position along the xaxis do not commute, [x,px] � 0. In fact, [x,px] = iá.
The argument that we have made for linear momentum also applies to the angular momentum of a particle. For example, consider a particle traversing a circular trajectory. In this case we have seen that the wave function is Y = eimf. This implies azimuthal angular momenta of mh. For each of these momentum states if we now ask where the particle is on the circle we find.
So that the probability of finding the particle in any region of space is 1/2p. There is no f dependence and hence the location of the particle on the circle is completely undetermined. We can therefore understand that the same type of relationship exists between angular momenta and angular position as exists for linear momenta and linear position. The angular momentum relationships can also be expressed in terms of the total angular momentum and the azimuthal angular momentum. That is that we can know both Lz and L simultaneously, but not Lx or Ly and Lz simultaneously.
[Lz,L] = 0
but
[Lz,Lx] = iáLy , [Lx,Ly] = iáLz , and [Ly,Lz] = iáLx
It is important that the same type of conjugate variable relationship exists between the energy e and time t such that the uncertainty in the energy times the uncertainty in the time is of the order of Planck�s constant as well. DeDt = á exactly analogous to the relationship between momentum and position given above. The mathematical form of the of the Fourier transform is identical if k ® w and x ® t.
The latter relationship is important since it implies that the lifetime of a state results in an energy width or the duration of a laser pulse implies a certain spectral width. If we use the properties of Gaussians shown above for the position/momentum conjugate variables we can calculate a spectral width for a given time duration. We do this in terms of Joules and wave numbers. The wave number unit is particularly valuable since spectra are reported in cm1.
Time  (sec)  Joules  cm1 

1 ns  109  1025  0.005 

10 ns  1010  1024  0.05 

100 ns  1011  1023  0.5 

1 ps  1012  1022  5 

10 ps  1013  1021  50 

100 ps  1014  1020  500 

1 fs  1015  1019  5000 

Analytical Chemistry
Biological Chemistry
Inorganic Chemistry
Organic Chemistry
Physical Chemistry
Theoretical Chemistry
Cal Poly Pomona
Columbia U
Diablo Valley College
Florida State U
Hope College
Purdue
Sacramento City College
UC Davis
UC Irvine
Zumdahl 9^{ed}
Petrucci 10^{ed}
McQuarrie & Simon
Kotz et al.
Tro
Bruice 6^{ed}
An NSF funded Project
UC Davis ChemWiki is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNoncommercialShare Alike 3.0 United States License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at copyright@ucdavis.edu. Questions and concerns can be directed toward Prof. Delmar Larsen (dlarsen@ucdavis.edu), Founder and Director. Terms of Use
By STEMWiki Hyperlibrary