ChemWiki: The Dynamic Chemistry E-textbook > Physical Chemistry > Spectroscopy > Electronic Spectroscopy > The atomic spectrum > Atomic Term Symbols

In electronic spectroscopy, an atomic term symbol specifies a certain electronic state of an atom (usually a multi-electron one), by briefing the quantum numbers for the angular momenta of that atom. The form of an atomic term symbol implies **Russell-Saunders** coupling. Transitions between two different atomic states may be represented using their term symbols, to which certain rules apply.

At the beginning, the spectroscopic notation for term symbols was derived from an obsolete system of categorizing spectral lines.

In 1885, Johann Balmer, a Swiss mathematician, discovered the Balmer formula for a series of hydrogen emission lines.

\[ \lambda=B(\frac{m^2}{m^2-4}) \]

where *B* is constant, and *m* is an integer greater than 2. Later it was extended by Johannes Rydberg and Walter Ritz, and became a principle for all atoms.^{1}

Yet this principle could hardly explain the discovery of fine structure, the splitting of spectral lines. In spectroscopy, spectral lines of alkali metals used to be divided into categories: sharp, principal, diffuse and fundamental, based on their fine structures.^{2} These categories, or "term series," then became associated with atomic energy levels along with the birth of the old quantum theory.^{3} The initials of those categories were employed to mark the atomic orbitals with respect to their azimuthal^{Note}^{ 1} quantum numbers.^{4} The sequence of "s, p, d, f, g, h, i, k..." is known as the spectroscopic notation for atomic orbitals.

By introducing spin as a nature of electrons, the fine structure of alkali spectra became further understood. The term "spin" was first used to describe the rotation of electrons. Later, although electrons have been proved inable to rotate, the word "spin" is reserved and used to describe the property of an electron that involves its intrinsic magnetism.

LS coupling was first proposed by Henry Russell and Frederick Saunders in 1923.^{5} It perfectly explained the fine structures of hydrogen-like atomic spectra. The format of term symbols was developed in the Russell-Saunders coupling scheme.

In the Russell-Saunders coupling scheme, term symbols are in the form of ^{2S+}^{1}*L _{J}*, where

In today's physics, an electron in a spherecally symmetric potential field can be described by four quantum numbers all together, which applies to hydrogen-like atoms only. Yet other atoms may undergo trivial approximations in order to fit in this description. Those quantum numbers each present a conserved property, such as the orbital angular momentum. They are sufficient to distinguish a particular electron within one atom. The term "angular momentum" describes the phenomenon that an electron distributes its position around the nucleus. Yet the underlying quantum mechanics is much more complicated than mere mechanical movement.

The azimuthal angular momentum (or the orbital angular momentum when describing an electron in an atom) specifies the azimuthal component of the total angular momentum for a particular electron in an atom. The orbital quantum number, *l*, one of the four quantum numbers of an electron, has been used to represent the azimuthal angular momentum. The value of *l* is an integer ranging from 0 to n-1, while n is the principal quantum number of the electron. The limits of *l* came from the solutions of the Schrödinger Equation.

The intrinsic angular momentum (or the spin) represents the intrinsic property of elementry particles, and the particles made of them. The inherent magnetic momentum of an electron may be explained by its intrinsic angular momentum. In LS-coupling, the spin of an electron can couple with its azimuthal angular momentum. The spin quantum number of an electron has a value of either ½ or -½, which reflects the nature of the electron.

Coupling of angular momenta was first introduced to explain the fine structures of atomic spectra. As for LS coupling, S, L, J and M_{J} are the four "good" quantum numbers to describe electronic states in lighter atoms. For heavier atoms, jj coupling is more applicable, where J, M_{J}, M_{L} and M_{s} are "good" quantum numbers.

LS coupling, also known as Russell-Saunders coupling, assumes that the interaction between an electron's intrinsic angular momentum **s** and its orbital angular momentum **L** is small enough to be considered as an perturbation to the electronic Hamiltonian. Such interaction can be derived in a classical way.^{6}

Let's suppose that the electron goes around the nucleus in a circular orbit, as in Bohr model.^{7}Set the electron's velocity to be **V _{e}**. The electron experiences a magnetic field

\[ \mathbf{B}=\frac{1}{m_ec^2}(\mathbf{E} \times \mathbf{p})= \frac{Ze}{4 \pi \epsilon_0m_ec^2r^3} \mathbf{L} \]

while **E** is the electric field at the electron due to the nucleus, **p** the classical monumentum of the electron, and r the distance between the electron and the nucleus.

The electron's spin **s** brings a magnetic dipole moment **μ _{s}**

\[ \mathbf \mu_s= \frac{-g_{se} \mathbf{s}}{2m_e}( \hat{ \mathbf{L}} \cdot \hat{ \mathbf{s}})\]

where *g*_{s} is the gyromagnetic ratio of an electron. Since the potential energy of the coulumbic attraction between the electron and nucleus is^{6}

\[ V (r) = \dfrac{-Ze^2}{4πε_0r} \]

the interaction between * μ_{s}* and

\[ \hat{H}_{so}=\frac{g_s}{2m_e^2c^2} \frac{Ze^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_{_0}r^2}( \mathbf{L} \cdot \mathbf{s})=\frac{g_s}{2m_e^2c^2} \frac{ \partial{V}}{ \partial{r}}( \mathbf{L} \cdot \mathbf{s}) \]

After a correction due to centripetal acceleration^{10}, the interaction has a format of

\[ \hat{H}_{so} = \frac{1}{2 \mu^2c^2} \frac{ \partial{V}}{ \partial{r}}( \mathbf{L} \cdot \mathbf{s}) \]

Thus the coupling energy is

\[ \langle \psi_{nlm}| \hat{H}_{so}| \psi_{nlm} \rangle \]

In lighter atoms, the coupling energy is low enough be treated as a first-order perturbation to the total electronic Hamiltonian, hence LS coupling is applicable to them. For a single electron, the spin-orbit coupling angular momentum quantum number j has the following possible values

*j* = |*l*-*s*|, ..., *l*+*s*

if the total angular momentum **J** is defined as **J** = **L** + **s**. The azimuthal counterpart of *j* is *m _{j}*, which can be a whole number in the range of [-

The first-order perturbation to the electronic energy can be deduced so^{6}

\[ \frac{\hbar^2[j(j+1)-l(l+1)-s(s+1)]}{4\mu^2c^2}\int_0^\infty r^2dr \frac{1}{r} \frac{ \partial{V}}{\partial{r}}R_{nl}^2(r) \]

Above is about the spin-orbit coupling of one electron. For many-electron atoms, the idea is similar. The coupling of angular momenta is

\[ \mathbf{J}=\mathbf{L}+\mathbf{S} \]

thereby the total angular quantum number

*J* = |*L*-*S*|, ..., *L*+*S*

where the total orbital quantum number

\[ L=\sum\limits_i l_i \]

and the total spin quantum number

\[ S=\sum\limits_{isi} \]

While **J** is still the total angular momentum, **L** and **S** are the total orbital angular momentum and the total spin, respectively. The magnetic momentum due to **J** is

\[ \mathbf \mu_J=- \frac{g_Je \mathbf{J}}{2m_e} \]

wherein the Landé *g* factor is

\[ g_J=1+\frac{J(J+1)+S(S+1)-L(L+1)} {2J(J+1)} \]

supposing the gyromagnetic ratio of an electron is 2.

For heavier atoms, the coupling between the total angular momenta of different electrons is more significant, causing the fine structures not to be "fine" any more. Therefore the coupling term can no more be considered as a perturbation to the electronic Hamiltonian, so that jj coupling is a better way to quantize the electron energy states and levels.

For each electron, the quantum number *j* = *l* + *s*. For the whole atom, the total angular momentum quantum number

\[ J= \sum \limits_i j_i \]

Term symbols usually represent electronic states in the Russell-Saunders coupling scheme, where a typical atomic term symbol consists of the spin multiplicity, the symmetry label and the total angular momentum of the atom. Usually they have the format of ^{2S+1}*L*_{J}, such as ^{3}*D*_{2}, where *S* = 1, L = 2, and *J* = 2.

Here is a commonly used method to determine term symbols for an electron configuration. It requires a table of possibilities of different "micro states," which happened to be called "Slater's table".^{6} Each row of the table represents a total magnetic quantum number, while each column does a total spin. Using this table we can pick out the possible electronic states easily since all terms are concentric rectangles on the table.

The method of using a table to count possible "microstates" has been developed so long ago and honed by so many scientists and educators that it is hard to accredit a single person. Let's take the electronic configuration of d^{3} as an example. In the Slater's table, each cell contains the number of ways to assign the three electrons quantum numbers according to the M_{S} and M_{L} values. These assignments follow Pauli's exclusion law. The figure below shows an example to find out how many ways to assign quantum numbers to d^{3} electrons when M_{L} = 3 and M_{S} = -1/2.

| M | ||||

-3/2 | -1/2 | 1/2 | 3/2 | ||

M | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |

4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |

3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | |

2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 1 | |

1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 2 | |

0 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 2 | |

-1 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 2 | |

-2 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 1 | |

-3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | |

-4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |

-5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |

Now we start to subtract term symbols from this table. First there is a ^{2}H state. And now it is subtracted from the table.

| M | ||||

-3/2 | -1/2 | 1/2 | 3/2 | ||

M | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |

3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |

2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | |

1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 2 | |

0 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 2 | |

-1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 2 | |

-2 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | |

-3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | |

-4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |

-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

And now is a ^{4}F state. After being subtracted by ^{4}F, the table becomes

| M | ||||

-3/2 | -1/2 | 1/2 | 3/2 | ||

M | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |

3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |

2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | |

1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 1 | |

0 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 1 | |

-1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 1 | |

-2 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | |

-3 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |

-4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |

-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

And now ^{2}G.

| M | ||||

-3/2 | -1/2 | 1/2 | 3/2 | ||

M | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |

2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | |

1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | |

0 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | |

-1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | |

-2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | |

-3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |

-4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

^{2}F.

| M | ||||

-3/2 | -1/2 | 1/2 | 3/2 | ||

M | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |

1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | |

0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | |

-1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | |

-2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |

-3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

-4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

Here in the table are two ^{2}D states.

| M | ||||

-3/2 | -1/2 | 1/2 | 3/2 | ||

M | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |

0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |

-1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |

-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

-3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

-4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

^{4}P.

| M | ||||

-3/2 | -1/2 | 1/2 | 3/2 | ||

M | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |

0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |

-1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |

-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

-3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

-4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |

-5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

And the final deducted state is ^{2}P. So in total the possible states for a d^{3} configuration are ^{4}F, ^{4}P, ^{2}H, ^{2}G, ^{2}F, ^{2}D, ^{2}D and ^{2}P. Taken *J* into consideration, the possible states are:

\[ ^4F_2\; ^4F_3 \; ^4F_4\; ^4P_0\; ^4P_1\; ^4P_2\; ^2H_\frac{9}{2} \; ^2H_\frac{11}{2} \; ^2G_\frac{9}{2} \; ^2G_\frac{7}{2} \; ^2F_\frac{7}{2}\; ^2F_\frac{5}{2} \; ^2D_\frac{5}{2} \; ^2D_\frac{5}{2} \; ^2D_\frac{3}{2} \; ^2D_\frac{3}{2}\; ^2P_\frac{3}{2} \; ^2P_\frac{3}{2} \]

For lighter atoms before or among the first-row transition metals, this method works well.

Another method is to use direct products in group theory to quickly work out possible term symbols for a certain electronic configuration.^{11}

Basically, both electrons and holes are taken into consideration, which naturally results in the same term symbols for complementary configurations like p^{2} vs p^{4}. Electrons are categorized by spin, therefore divided into two categories, α and β, as are holes: α stands for +1, and βstands for -1, or vice versa. Term symbols of different possible configurations within one category are given. The term symbols for the total electronic configuration are derived from direct products of term symbols for different categories of electrons. For the p^{3} configuration, for example, the possible combinations of different categories are *e _{α}^{3}*,

*P* × *P* = *S* + [*P*] + *D*.

The direct product for *e _{α}* and

*P* × *P* = *S* + [*P*] + *D*.

Considering the degeneracy, eventually the term symbols for p^{3} configuration are ^{4}S, ^{2}D and ^{2}P.

There is a specially modified version of this method for atoms with 2 unpaired electrons. The only step gives the direct product of the symmetries of the two orbitals. The degeneracy is still determined by Pauli's exclusion.

In general, states with a greater degeneracy have a lower energy, according to statistics.^{12} For one configuration, the level with the largest *S*, which has the largest spin degeneracy, has the lowest energy. If two levels have the same *S* value, then the one with the larger *L* (and also the larger orbital degeneracy) have the lower energy. If the electrons in the subshell are fewer than half-filled, the ground state should have the smallest value of *J*, otherwise the ground state has the greatest value of *J*.

Electrons of an atom may undergo certain transitions which may have strong or weak intensities. There are rules about which trasitions should be strong and which should be weak. Usually an electronic transition is excited by heat or radiation.

Electronic states can be interpreted by solutions of Schödinger's equation. Those solutions have certain symmetries, which are a factor of whether transitions will be allowed or not. The transition may be triggered by an electric dipole momentum, a magnetic dipole momentum, and so on. These triggers are transition operators. The most common and usually most intense transitions occur in an electric dipolar field, so the selection rules are

- Δ
*L*= 0, ±1 except*L*= 0 ‡*L*' = 0 - Δ
*S*= 0 - Δ
*J*= 0; ±1 except*J*= 0 ‡*J*' = 0

where a double dagger means not combinable. For jj coupling, only the third rule applies with an addition rule: Δ*j* = 0; ±1.

- Azimuthal means "of azimuth." The definition of azimuth is the angular difference between the projection of the direction of interest on a reference plane and that of a reference direction. When the reference plane is the horizon and the reference direction is North, it becomes the commonly recognized arimuth in astronomy.

- W. Ritz (1908), "On a New Law of Series Spectra",
*Astrophysical Journal*28(10): 237. doi: 10.1086/141591 - §7.12, Jeremy B. Tatum,
*Stellar Atomsphere*, online book. Accessed on line February 6, 2011. - Herzberg, Gerhard (1945).
*Atomic Spectra and Atomic Structure*. New York: Dover. pp. 54–5. ISBN 0-486-60115-3. - Levine, Ira (2000).
*Quantum Chemistry*(5 ed.). Prentice Hall. pp. 144–145. ISBN 0-13-685512-1 - George Kean Sweetnam,
*The Command of Light*- google books. P 182. - W. S. Struve (1989),
*Fundamentals of Molecular Spectroscopy*, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 44-46, 61-62. ISBN 0-471-85424-7 - Niels Bohr (1913). "On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules, Part I".
*Philosophical Magazine*26: 1–24 - M. H. Nayfeh, M. K (1985). Brussel,
*Electricity and Magnetism*, Wiley, New York. ISBN 0-471-87681-X - E. Merzbacher (1966),
*Quantum Mechanics*, Wiley, New York. - W. H. Furry (1955), "Lorentz transformation and the Thomas precession",
*American Journal of Physics*23(8); 517-525. doi: 10.1119/1.1934085 - Darl H. McDaniel, "Spin factoring as an aid in the determination of spectroscopic terms",
*Journal of Chemical Education*54(3):147 (1977). doi: 10.1021/ed054p147 - Fermi, Enrico (1926). "
*Sulla quantizzazione del gas perfetto monoatomico*" (in Italian). Rend. Lincei 3: 145–9., translated as On the Quantization of the Monoatomic Ideal Gas. 1999-12-14.

- Potassium has the electronic configuration of [Ar]4s
^{1}, what are the possible term symbols of a neutral K atom? - What is the ground state of Cr
^{2+}? Specify the value of*J*. - Why does not the spin selection rule apply for electronic transitions under jj coupling?
- Why do different term symbols appear as rectangles on the Slater's table?
- Tanabe-Sugano diagrams tell us the order of energy levels in a complex, usually the order of d electron levels. Look up for the possible term symbols for the d
^{2}configuration, and determine how many fundamentals (transition from the ground state to an excited state) may occur when Δ = 0 i.e. minor field due to ligands.

^{2}S.^{5}D.- Under jj coupling the spin quantum number is not a "good" quantum number any more, which means it cannot describe and differentiate electronic states properly.
- A certain term symbol represents a certain value of
*L*as well as of*S*, which implies limited possible values of*M*_{L}and*M*_{s}. Following Pauli's exclusion rule, there must be only one possible way to assign the configuration a certain value of*M*_{L}and*M*_{s}. - No appropriate answer.

- Anda Zheng (UCD)

**Analytical Chemistry****Biological Chemistry****Inorganic Chemistry****Organic Chemistry****Physical Chemistry****Theoretical Chemistry**

**Cal Poly Pomona****Columbia U****Diablo Valley College****Florida State U****Hope College****Reynolds Community College****New Mexico State U Alamogordo****Sacramento City College****Truman State U****UC Davis****UC Irvine**

An NSF funded Project

- © Copyright 2014 Chemwiki

UC Davis GeoWiki by University of California, Davis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at copyright@ucdavis.edu. Terms of Use