ChemWiki: The Dynamic Chemistry E-textbook > Physical Chemistry > Spectroscopy > Rotational Spectroscopy > Rovibrational Spectroscopy

- 1. Introduction
- 2. Selection Rules
- 3. Energy
- 4. Ideal Spectrum
- 5. Real Spectra
- 5.1. Rotational-Vibrational Coupling
- 5.1.1. Combination Differences
- 5.1.2. Centrifugal Distortion

- 5.1. Rotational-Vibrational Coupling
- 6. References
- 7. Outside Links
- 8. Problems
- 9. Answers to Problems

There are rotational energy levels associated with all vibrational levels. From this, vibrational transitions can couple with rotational transitions to give rovibrational spectra. Rovibrational spectra can be analyzed to determine average bond length.

- 1. Introduction
- 2. Selection Rules
- 3. Energy
- 4. Ideal Spectrum
- 5. Real Spectra
- 5.1. Rotational-Vibrational Coupling
- 5.1.1. Combination Differences
- 5.1.2. Centrifugal Distortion

- 5.1. Rotational-Vibrational Coupling
- 6. References
- 7. Outside Links
- 8. Problems
- 9. Answers to Problems

Each of the normal modes of vibration of heteronuclear diatomic molecules in the gas phase also contains closely-spaced (1-10 cm^{-1} difference) energy states attributable to rotational transitions that accompany the vibrational transitions. A molecule’s rotation can be affected by its vibrational transition because there is a change in bond length, so these rotational transitions are expected to occur. Since vibrational energy states are on the order of 1000 cm^{-1}, the rotational energy states can be superimposed upon the vibrational energy states.

We treat the molecule's **vibrations** as those of a harmonic oscillator (ignoring anharmonicity). The energy of a vibration is quantized in discrete levels and given by

\[E_v=h\nu \left(v+\frac{1}{2} \right) \]

Where v is the vibrational quantum number and can have integer values 0, 1, 2..., and \(\nu\) is the frequency of the vibration given by:

\[\nu=\dfrac{1}{2\pi}\left(\dfrac{k}{\mu}\right)^\frac{1}{2}\]

Where k is the force constant and \(\mu\) is the reduced mass of a diatomic molecule with atom masses m_{1} and m_{2}, given by

\[\mu=\dfrac{{m}_1{m}_2}{{m}_1+{m}_2}\]

We treat the molecule's **rotations** as those of a rigid rotor (ignoring centrifugal distortion). The energy of a rotation is also quantized in discrete levels given by

\[ E_r=\dfrac{h^2}{8\pi^2I} J(J+1)\]

In which I is the moment of inertia, given by

\[{I}=\mu{r}^2\]

Where \(\mu\) is the reduced mass from above and r is the equilibrium bond length.

Experimentally, frequencies or wavenumbers are measured rather than energies, and dividing by h or hc gives more commonly seen term symbols, F(J) using the rotational quantum number J and the rotational constant B in either frequency

\[F(J)=\dfrac{E_r}{h}=\dfrac{h}{8\pi^2I} J(J+1)=BJ(J+1)\]

or wavenumbers

\[F(J)=\dfrac{E_r}{hc}=\dfrac{h}{8\pi^2cI} J(J+1)=BJ(J+1)\]

At room temperature, typically only the lowest energy vibrational state v= 0 is populated, so typically v_{0} = 0 and ∆v = +1. The full selection rule is technically that ∆v = ±1, however here we assume energy can only go upwards because of the lack of population in the upper vibrational states.

At room temperature, states with J≠0 can be populated since they represent the fine structure of vibrational states and have smaller energy differences than successive vibrational levels. Additionally, ∆J = ±1 since a photon contains one quantum of angular momentum and we abide by the principle of conservation of energy. This is also the selection rule for rotational transitions.

The transition ∆J = 0 (i.e. J" = 0 and J' = 0, but \(\nu_0 \neq 0\) is forbidden and the pure vibrational transition is not observed in most cases. The rotational selection rule gives rise to an R-branch (when ∆J = +1) and a P-branch (when ∆J = -1). Each line of the branch is labeled R(J) or P(J), where J represents the value of the lower state.

When ∆J = +1, i.e. the rotational quantum number in the ground state is one more than the rotational quantum number in the excited state – R branch (in French, *riche* or rich). To find the energy of a line of the R-branch:

\[\Delta{E}=h\nu_0 +hB \left [J(J+1)-J^\prime (J^\prime{+1}) \right] \]

\[=h\nu_0 +hB \left[(J+1)(J+2)-J(J+1)\right] \]

\[=h\nu_0 +2hB(J+1) \]

When ∆J = -1, i.e. the rotational quantum number in the ground state is one less than the rotational quantum number in the excited state – P branch (in French, *pauvre* or poor). To find the energy of a line of the P-branch:

\[\Delta{E}=h\nu_0 +hB \left [J(J+1)-J^\prime(J^\prime+1) \right]\]

\[=h\nu_0 +hB \left [J(J-1)-J(J+1) \right] \]

\[=h\nu_0 -2hBJ\]

When ∆J = 0, i.e. the rotational quantum number in the ground state is the same as the rotational quantum number in the excited state – Q branch (simple, the letter between P and R). To find the energy of a line of the Q-branch:

\[\Delta{E}=h\nu_0 +hB[J(J+1)-J^\prime(J^\prime+1)]\]

\[=h\nu_0\]

The Q-branch can be observed in polyatomic molecules and diatomic molecules with electronic angular momentum in the ground electronic state, e.g. nitric oxide, NO. Most diatomics, such as O_{2}, have a small moment of inertia and thus very small angular momentum and yield no Q-branch.

**Figure 1**: Cartoon depiction of rotational energy levels, J, imposed on vibrational energy levels, v. The transitions between levels that would result in the P- and R-branches are depicted in purple and red, respectively, in addition to the theoretical Q-branch line in blue.

As seen in Figure 1, the lines of the P-branch (represented by purple arrows) and R-branch (represented by red arrows) are separated by specific multiples of B (2B), thus the bond length can be deduced without the need for pure rotational spectroscopy.

The total nuclear energy of the combined rotation-vibration terms, S(v, J), can be written as the sum of the vibrational energy and the rotational energy

\[ S(v,J)=G(v)+F(J) \]

Where G(v) represents the energy of the harmonic oscillator, ignoring anharmonic components and S(J) represents the energy of a rigid rotor, ignoring centrifugal distortion.

From this, we can derive

\[ S(v,J)=\nu_0 v+\frac{1}{2}+BJ(J+1)\]

The relative intensity of the P- and R-branch lines depends on the thermal distribution of electrons; more specifically, they depend on the population of the lower J state. If we represent the population of the Jth upper level as N_{J} and the population of the lower state as N_{0}, we can find the population of the upper state relative to the lower state using the Boltzmann distribution:

\[\dfrac{N_J}{N_0}={(2J+1)e}^\left(-\dfrac{E_r}{kT}\right)\]

(2J+1) gives the degeneracy of the Jth upper level arising from the allowed values of M_{J} (+J to –J). As J increases, the degeneracy factor increases and the exponential factor decreases until at high J, the exponential factor wins out and N_{J}/N_{0} approaches zero at a certain level, J_{max}. Thus, when

\[ \dfrac{d}{dJ} \left( \dfrac{N_J}{N_0} \right)=0\]

by differentiation, we obtain

\[J_{max}=\left(\dfrac{kT}{2hB}\right)^\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{2}\]

This is the reason that rovibrational spectral lines increase in energy to a maximum as J increases, then decrease to zero as J continues to increase, as seen in Figure 2 and Figure 3.

From this relationship, we can also deduce that in heavier molecules, B will decrease because the moment of inertia will increase, and the decrease in the exponential factor is less pronounced. This results in the population distribution shifting to higher values of J. Similarly, as temperature increases, the population distrubution will shift towards higher values of J.

The spectrum we expect, based on the conditions described above, consists of lines equidistant in energy from one another, separated by a value of 2B. The *relative *intensity of the lines is a function of the rotational populations of the ground states, i.e. the intensity is proportional to the number of molecules that have made the transition. The *overall* intensity of the lines depends on the vibrational transition dipole moment.

**Figure 2**: A cartoon depiction of an ideal rovibrational spectrum.

Between P(1) and R(0) lies the zero gap, where the the first lines of both the P- and R-branch are separated by 4B, assuming that the rotational constant B is equal for both energy levels. The zero gap is also where we would expect the Q-branch, depicted as the dotted line, if it is allowed.

We find that real spectra doesn't exactly fit the expectations from above.

**Figure 3**: A cartoon depiction of a real rovibrational spectrum.

As energy increases, the R-branch lines become increasingly similar in energy (i.e. the lines move closer together) and as energy decreases, the P-branch lines become increasingly dissimilar in energy (i.e. the lines move farther apart). This is attributable to two phenomena: rotational-vibrational coupling and centrifugal distortion.

As a diatomic molecule vibrates, its bond length changes. Since the moment of inertia is dependent on the bond length, it too changes and, in turn, changes the rotational constant B. We assumed above that B of R(0) and B of P(1) were equal, however they differ because of this phenomenon and B is given by

\[B_e= (-\alpha_e \nu+\frac{1}{2})\]

Where \({B}_{e}\) is the rotational constant for a rigid rotor and \(\alpha_{e}\) is the rotational-vibrational coupling constant. The information in the band can be used to determine B_{0} and B_{1} of the two different energy states as well as the rotational-vibrational coupling constant, which can be found by the method of combination differences.

Combination differences involves finding the values of B_{0} and B_{1} rotational-vibrational coupling constant by measuring the change for two different transitions sharing a common state.

**Figure 4:** Part of the method of combination differences depicting P- and R-branch transitions sharing a common lower J state.

To determine B_{1}, we pair transitions sharing a common lower state; here, R(1) and P(1). Note that the vibrational level does not change. Both branches begin with J = 1, so by finding the difference in energy between the lines, we find B_{1}.

\[\Delta E_R-\Delta E_P={E(\nu{=1, J}^\prime{=J+1)-E({\nu={1,J}^\prime{=J-1)}\]

Inserting this information into the equation from above, we obtain

\[=\tilde{\nu}{[R(J-1)]-}\tilde{\nu}{[P(J+1)]}\]

\[=\omega_0+{B}_1{(J+1)(J+2)-B}_0{J(J+1)-[}\omega_0{+B}_1{(J-1)J-B}_0{J(J+1)]\]

\[={4B}_1{(J+}\frac{1}{2}{)}\]

If we plot \(\Delta E_R-\Delta E_P \) against \( (J+ \frac{1}{2} \ ), we obtain a straight line with slope 4B_{1}.

**Figure 5**: Part of the method of combination differences depicting P- and R-branch transitions sharing a common upper J state.

Similarly, we can determine B_{0} by finding wavenumber differences in transitions sharing a common upper state; here, R(0) and P(2). Both branches terminate at J=1 and differences will only depend on B_{0}.

\[=\tilde{\nu}{[R(J-1)]-}\tilde{\nu}{[P(J+1)]}\]

\[=\omega_0+{B}_1{J(J+2)-B}_0{J(J-1)-[}\omega_0{+B}_1{J(J+1)-B}_0{(J+1)(J+2)]\]

\[={4B}_0{(J+}\frac{1}{2}{)}\]

As before, if we plot \[\Delta{E}_{R}-\Delta{E}_{P}\] against \[{(J+}\frac{1}{2}{)}\], we obtain a straight line with slope 4B_{0}.

Following from this, we can obtain the rotational-vibrational coupling constant:

\[={B}_1-{B}_0=\alpha\]

Similarly to rotational-vibrational coupling, centrifugal distortion is related to the changing bond length of a molecule. A real molecule does not behave as a rigid rotor that has a rigid rod for a chemical bond, but rather acts as if it has a spring for a chemical bond. As the rotational velocity of a molecule increases, its bond length increases and its moment of inertia increases. As the moment of inertia increases, the rotational constant B decreases.

\[{F(J)=BJ(J+1)-DJ}^2{(J+1)}^2\]

Where D is the centrifugal distortion constant and is related to the vibration wavenumber, \[(omega\)

\[D=\dfrac{4B^3}{\omega^2}\]

When the above factors are accounted for, the actual energy of a rovibrational state is

\[ S(v,J)=\nu_0v+\frac{1}{2}+B_e J (J+1)- \alpha_e \left(v+\frac{1}{2}\right) J(J+1)-D_e[J(J+1)]^2\]

- Hollas, M. J.
*Modern spectroscopy*. (3rd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1996. - Hollas, M. J.
*Basic atomic and molecular spectroscopy*. Cambridge: The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2002. - Herzberg, G.
*Molecular spectra and molecular structure*. (2nd ed.). New York: Prentice-Hall, 1950. - Fetterolf, Monty L. Enhanced Intensity Distribution Analysis of the Rotational–Vibrational Spectrum of HCl.J. Chem. Ed.
**2007**,*84*, 1064. DOI: 10.1021/ed084p1062

- Find the reduced mass of D
^{35}Cl in kg, if the mass of D-2 is 2.014 amu and the mass of Cl-35 is 34.968 amu. - Using information found in problem 1, calculate the rotational constant B (in wavenumbers) of D
^{35}Cl given that the average bond length is 1.2745 Å. - Using the rigid rotor approximation, estimate the bond length in a
^{12}C^{16}O molecule if the energy difference between J=1 and J=3 were to equal 14,234 cm^{-1}.

1. \(dfrac{2.014 amu*34.968 amu}{2.014 amu + 34.968 amu}\) gives 1.807 amu. To convert to kg, multiple by 1.66 x 10^{-27} kg/amu. **Answer: 3.00 x 10 ^{-27} kg**

2. We know that in wavenumbers, \(B=\dfrac{h}{8\pi^2cI}\).

First, we must solve for the moment of inertia, I, using

\[{I}=\mu{r}^2=(3.00*10^{-27} kg)(1.2745 *10^{-10}m)^2\] = 4.87 x 10^{-47} kg•m^{2}= I

We can now substitute into the original formula to solve for B. h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light in m/s and I = 4.87 x 10^{-47} kg•m^{2}^{. }This will give us the answer in m^{-1}, then we can convert to cm^{-1}. **Answer: 5.74 cm ^{-1}.**

3. We use the same formula as above and expand the moment of inertia in order to solve for the average bond length.

\[B=\dfrac{h}{8\pi^2 c\mu r^2}\]

We can deduce the rotational constant B since we know the distance between two energy states and the relationship

\[F(J)=BJ(J+1)\]

The distance between J=1 and J=3 is 10B, so using the fact that B = 14,234 cm^{-1}, B=1423.4 cm^{-1}. We convert this to m^{-1} so that it will match up with the units of the speed of light (m/s) and obtain B = 142340 m^{-1}.

Using the reduced mass formula, we find that µ = 1.138 x 10^{-26} kg. **Answer: r = 81 Å. **

Contributors

- Joya Cooley, UC Davis

**Analytical Chemistry****Biological Chemistry****Inorganic Chemistry****Organic Chemistry****Physical Chemistry****Theoretical Chemistry**

**Cal Poly Pomona****Columbia U****Diablo Valley College****Florida State U****Hope College****Reynolds Community College****New Mexico State U Alamogordo****Sacramento City College****Truman State U****UC Davis****UC Irvine**

An NSF funded Project

- © Copyright 2014 Chemwiki

UC Davis GeoWiki by University of California, Davis is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at copyright@ucdavis.edu. Terms of Use