ChemWiki

username password

Alkenes by Dehydration of Alcohols

    Table of contents
    No headers
    Kim Quach says:
    Good job! This is a very descriptive and simple explanation. :)

    Just a few points to make your module a little clearer. You might want to include a link to E1 and E2. You do a nice job explaining the overall mechanisms but it would help those who want more info on elimination. You can also show backside attack for E2 in your reaction diagram.

    Under tertiary alcohols, you say "thermodynamically most stable alkene." Is trans considered as thermodynamically favorable? Or is the most substituted alkene considered thermodynamic? (Explain what your mean by thermodynamic) You might want to explain what the kinectic product is too to give a complete description of what products are produced. You can also explain the products produced with an energy/rxn coordinate graph/diagram.
    Posted 13:48, 3 Mar 2009
    Chin Kan says:
    This is excellent work!! It gives clear explainations of everything, even hydride shifts and alkyl shifts. The E1 and E2 mechanisms are very easy to understand!!!

    Here are some suggestions, maybe you can explain why trans is less favourable than cis products in dehydration of tertiary alcohol, maybe due to steric hindrance and why are tertiary alkene more stable? maybe due to induction and hyperconjugation stabilization?

    But overall this is an excellent job!!! ^_^ edited 10:41, 7 Mar 2009
    Posted 10:37, 7 Mar 2009
    Satish Balasubramanian? says:

    Great module! It entails a lot of description and explanations.


    A suggestion I have for you is to explain why primary alcohols favor E1, and secondary favor etc.. You should go into the idea behind hyperconjugation, and the stabilizing effect it has on carbocation intermediates. This would allow the reader to grasp the concept better than merely memorizing. Also, you may want to elaborate on the product section in which you state that trans is a more favorable product. Why is this the case, and are there any exceptions? These are a few suggestions, however your page clearly explains the overall topic in great detail. Good job!

    Viewing 3 of 3 comments: view all
    Practice Problem #2 predicts two products based on a carbocation intermediate from an E1 mechanism; however, this is a primary alcohol - wouldn't the reaction most predictably proceed via E2 elimination and not incorporate a hydride shift, thus predicting methylenecyclohexane as the only major product?
    Posted 10:59, 30 Mar 2011
    Hi Delmar. I was browsing this wonderful site, reviewing some organic mechanisms when I noticed an error on a page you edited last.

    the page is http://chemwiki.ucdavis.edu/Organic_Chemistry/Hydrocarbons/Alkenes/Alkenes_by_Dehydration_of_Alcohols

    the errors pertain to the diagrams showing the dehydration of tertiary alcohols. the diagrams explaining this mechanism shows a secondary alcohol being dehydrated.
    Also a tri-substituted alkene is shown as the minor product while the major product is show to be a trans alkene

    I believe the tri-substituted alkene is the most stable product (lower energy). the two di-substituted alkenes should be the minor products, with the cis isomer being the least favored (highest energy).

    I have never edited a wiki site before, so I thought the best thing to do would be bring this to you attention.
    Posted 10:39, 8 May 2011
    Hi Delmar: The person who emailed you is correct in part- the mechanism for the "tertiary"alcohol actually shows a secondary alcohol, As a rule the major product should be the most substituted alkene, but the 'minor product' shown, while more substituted, also has an extra carbon that appeared from nowhere, so it should be deleted. There are actually four products to the dehydration shown, the E/Z 3-hexene and the E/Z 2-hexene. I'd suggest the writer start again with very simple tertiary alcohol such as tert-butanol, so the reader can focus on the mechanism without worrying about cis/trans, more/less substituted, or rearrangements. Then these other concepts can be illustrated one by one with appropriate simple examples: eg. a tertiary alcohol such as 2-methyl-2-butanol can clearly illustrate the more/less substituted alkene product concept without the complication of cis vs trans or possible rearrangements. Using color can help readers to keep track of carbons in rearrangements/alternative regiochemistry examples.


    The comment by zpriest is also correct, a primary alcohol wouldn't undergo an SN1 dehydration - better to illustrate rearrangements starting with 2o or 3o alcohols. This is true both in the problem and in the main text example. When showing the E2 dehydration of a primary alcohol, it would be good to mention that there is competition with SN2 reactions to form ethers.

    Chin Kan just mixed up terms, the trans alkene is favored over the cis (sounds like this is what he/she meant, but just made a typo)

    Hope this helps! I think the writer did a very good job, it's a tough thing to explain because so many different things are going on. I think the key is to pick the right examples so that each variation can be explained in turn.
    Posted 07:29, 9 May 2011
    Viewing 3 of 3 comments: view all
    You must login to post a comment.